Web application testing
Assess authentication, authorization, session security, input handling and business logic across customer-facing and internal applications.
Find exploitable weaknesses, understand business impact and prioritize practical remediation. Keldran delivers authorized offensive security assessments engineered around your systems—not generic scanner output.
We combine manual analysis and purpose-built tooling to evaluate the attack paths that matter to your business. Every assessment is scoped and explicitly authorized in writing.
Assess authentication, authorization, session security, input handling and business logic across customer-facing and internal applications.
Review REST and other API surfaces for broken object-level authorization, data exposure, identity flaws and misuse of sensitive operations.
Evaluate configuration, exposure and attack paths across cloud resources, network boundaries and supporting infrastructure within an agreed scope.
Model realistic attack scenarios against agreed objectives, with rules of engagement, safety controls and clear reporting.
Assess prompt-injection exposure, risky tool permissions, data access and operational controls for AI-enabled workflows when in scope.
Retest fixes, document residual exposure and help technical teams close the gap between findings and meaningful risk reduction.
We align deliverables with your environment, stakeholders and risk tolerance—rather than selling a one-size-fits-all package.
Define the assets, objectives, authorization, timing, contact points and boundaries of the assessment.
Combine manual methodology, selected tooling and evidence-based validation without exceeding the agreed scope.
Translate technical weaknesses into business-relevant impact, reproducible evidence and remediation guidance.
Help confirm the most important issues are addressed through a separately agreed retest.
Every engagement begins with a conversation about your goals, constraints and environment.
Yes. Keldran only conducts penetration testing on assets and systems for which the client has appropriate authorization, documented scope and agreed rules of engagement.
No. Automated tools can assist discovery, but manual validation, context, business logic and careful reporting are essential to a meaningful assessment.
We propose the appropriate reporting format during scoping. A typical engagement can include an executive summary, prioritized technical findings and remediation recommendations.
Tell us about the outcome you need. We'll help scope the next step.